Why does the MacBook charge by USB-C?
Most posts that are titled with a question then answer it in the post, but this is a serious question that I have, and one that I've been thinking about for a while now; Why would a company like Apple put USB-C on the MacBook? It totally makes sense why, because it's reversible, versatile, and it's compact, but why USB-C and not by Apple's own Lightning?
Some might say USB-C is more powerful for a full computer, but the MacBook is running on a very light Intel Core M processor that's even fan-less. Plus, if the Lightning cable is powerful enough to power a beefy iPad Pro, while also allowing for video-out, speedy transfers, and everything else the Lightning cable can do, it should also be powerful enough for a MacBook. Not to mention that everything else in Apple's mobile line-up is powered by the Lightning cable, such as the new Apple TV Remote, the iPad Pro Pencil, the Beats Pill+, and every iOS device currently sold. So why not the MacBook?
I'm not condo…
Some might say USB-C is more powerful for a full computer, but the MacBook is running on a very light Intel Core M processor that's even fan-less. Plus, if the Lightning cable is powerful enough to power a beefy iPad Pro, while also allowing for video-out, speedy transfers, and everything else the Lightning cable can do, it should also be powerful enough for a MacBook. Not to mention that everything else in Apple's mobile line-up is powered by the Lightning cable, such as the new Apple TV Remote, the iPad Pro Pencil, the Beats Pill+, and every iOS device currently sold. So why not the MacBook?
I'm not condo…