Skip to main content

Initial Reactions to YouTube TV: The Best Replacement for Cable TV

But First, Some Back Story

I’ve been a Sling subscriber on and off since 2016. I joined for the price mostly, as the no-contract, and no-haggling $30 price was hard to beat compared to Time Warner Cable. At the time, Sling was just about the only game in town offering an alternative to traditional cable and satellite. Sure, you don’t get locals, but an antenna works just fine, and even has better audio/video quality than cable, so I could deal with that to receive cable channels.

I like to think of Sling as a no-frills service. It works well enough, but there are some quirks to get used to coming from traditional cable. The biggest one for sure is its DVR. At the time, the only way to get DVR was to pay an extra $5 a month for 50 hours of storage that never deletes unless it needs to for space. Now DVR is included with less space for free, and you pay if you want more space. Fine, however not all channels include rewinding and pausing live TV. Even worse, when you’ve rewound a live program and a commercial happens, you’re stuck in that commercial without the ability to fast forward; A major inconvenience coming from a traditional DVR. Luckily with DVR playback, you can fast forward through commercials, but that doesn’t inspire confidence to those not used to the service.

I like having the Viacom channels in my lineup, so that limits my search for alternative cable services. I have used AT&T TV Now, Philo, and Spectrum’s streaming service, and have a few issues with them. Spectrum’s service lacks the DVR feature, at least it did when I was using it, so that’s out, not to mention their deceptive pricing which increases after a year. Philo is nice because it allows for starting over any show, meaning you can pause and rewind at any point and record as much as you want, and while the price is nice, the lineup is too thin for my liking. AT&T TV Now offers no pausing of live TV, so I passed on that (not to mention AT&T sucks). Which leaves out Hulu with Live and YouTube TV because they didn’t have the Viacom channels.

And Now, Let’s Talk About YouTube TV

Since the introduction of YouTube TV, Viacom’s channels were from the service, at least that was until a few days ago when Viacom announced they had reached a deal with Google to add them “in the summer,” whenever that is, but that’s good enough for me. After reading this, I immediately started a free trial because I have heard nothing but great things about the service, and I could easily see why.

First let’s talk about the local channels. Sling in my area offers zero local channels, which is pain. It either means I need to buy an AirTV box to get locals to integrate into the Sling guide with an antenna, or I need to keep locals separate in another TV input or service. Using another service or input simply means that local channels and cable channels exist in two different universes, and that is not convenient or easy to explain to anyone trying to watch TV. So when I bought the AirTV, I was disappointed to find that the audio/video quality of the stream is not on par with the Sling cable channels. It’s horribly compressed, especially considering how good it can look compared to just plugging in the antenna into the TV. Also, the tuner is extremely sensitive: things that came in through the TV’s tuner wouldn’t come in on the AirTV, or would have issues coming in that were otherwise strong, and even with both my Roku and AirTV connected through Ethernet, lag was a near 100% chance of occurring. Simply put, having locals just there on the YouTube TV guide without me needing to troubleshoot anything was a breath of fresh air. No fiddling with the rabbit ears, no frustration with lag, it just works, and it works well.

The second breath of fresh air came with the DVR. As I said above, Sling’s DVR forces you to think about how to use it. You can’t pause live TV and fast forward through commercials, if the channel you’re on even allows for pausing live TV, which most don’t (except for seemingly only the Viacom channels coincidentally). You also can’t pause and rewind live TV with the AirTV, a device you have to pay $99 for, excluding the price of an external hard drive, something the rest of competition allows for. This is not an issue with YouTube TV. Just pause the show, any show, and it behaves like a traditional DVR. A DVR with unlimited storage where the only limit being recordings expire after 9 months, which doesn’t concern me. There are so many things that just work, I sometimes forget that I can just use the service and not think about it.

Other nice features of YouTube TV that may not be unique, but are upgrades coming from Sling are customizable profiles where each user gets their own DVR, recommendations, and can remove channels from their guide and even adjust the order of the channels. Plus, Sling feels outdated compared to YouTube TV. Sling has essentially kept the same UI since I started using it in 2016. Sure, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, but certainly a fresh coat of paint wouldn’t hurt, and YouTube TV feels very fresh.

There are a few things I would change. One being the addition of a “jump to live” button. I’m used to just pressing the OK button to see information about what I’m watching, but this pauses the show. This makes sense with a platform like Android TV where there is no pause button, but there is pause button on a Roku remote, so this behavior is jarring, and causes a disruption in what I’m watching. I’m sure on shows and movies, most people don’t care about fast-forwarding to live to not miss anything, but with sports or something else where you want to skip ahead quickly, it would be nice for that to be a button. I’d also like to see the current time in the guide and in the info panel while watching content.

In conclusion

Really, those are my only few gripes. YouTube TV is fantastic. The best thing you can say about it is anyone coming from traditional TV will feel right at home. Sling certainly gets points for being the first service to bring cable TV over-the-top, but you can’t remain number one if you don’t evolve. Sling simply is cheaper and offers the most a-la-carte cable service you can get. At $30, if you don’t watch many channels, the base package is fine. However, to get Sling at the same number of channels as YouTube TV, you’re spending the same amount of money. YouTube TV is a far cleaner and easier service, which gives you locals channels, and less to fuss with. It’s really good, and when the Viacom channels come to the service, I’ll be even happier.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pluto TV: Viacom's Different Answer to Streaming

First, Some Context and History All the major media conglomerates are beginning to reign in their content from Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, and are bringing them to their own streaming services for maximum profits. AT&T, who owns WarnerMedia, Comcast, who owns NBCUniversal, and Disney, who also own Marvel and 21st Century Fox, have all announced that they are developing their own streaming services to house all of their valuable content available for a monthly fee. Want to watch Friends? You'll have to subscribe to AT&T's thing. Want to watch The Office? You'll also have to subscribe to Comcast's thing. They'll both probably cost around $10 a month, and you're also going to want Disney+, the home to Marvel. All of these companies are taking a non-linear subscription approach to delivering content, something that we first fell in love with when Netflix introduced their instant streaming service back when they were better known for delivering DVDs through …

Why I Cancelled YouTube TV

I made an article a week or so ago in defense of YouTube TV’s price increase, a stance I still stand by. Many users online are understandably upset about the new price, and that’s reasonable. Some articles are taking the discussion a bit further by suggesting that the price increase betrays the initial goal of YouTube TV and cord-cutting as a whole by offering content at remarkably low prices, which I disagree with.

YouTube TV’s goal was to make live TV better, and they succeeded. The service is generally regarded as the best online live TV service because it has the local channels, the guide is customizable, the DVR is at least as good as a traditional DVR in functionality (something no other online live TV service can say) and gives you unlimited storage with individual recordings lasting for 9 months, and the experience is at least as good as your cable service and probably even better. I call that a success.

The problem comes with the channel lineup. The service initially cost $35, …

Will the ViacomCBS and Disney/Fox Merger Affect Cable TV Prices?

Yes it will, but the reason I ask this question is not from a traditional cable TV perspective, but from a vMVPD, like Sling, and YouTube TV for example.
With Sling, they have three base packages: Sling Blue, Sling Orange, and Sling Blue+Orange. Once upon a time, the difference was essentially if you want Disney channels like ESPN, Freeform, and Disney Channel, those were on Sling Orange, and Sling Blue had the Fox and Comcast channels. Or get both Orange and Blue. Also, the Viacom channels were included on either package, but the CBS channels weren't. Now that it's 2020, the combined entity that is ViacomCBS has stated they have some renewals this year, especially with vMVPDs, which is what made me question how a service like Sling will change, seeing that Disney now owns the FX networks, will they move into the Sling Orange package? Seeing that CBS's cable channels aren't on Sling, will ViacomCBS force their carriage with their renewal? How will this affect the pric…