Skip to main content

Pluto TV Adds More ViacomCBS Content, and My Thoughts on CBS All Access’s Future

Back in January 2019, it was announced that ViacomCBS acquired Pluto TV. At the time, it was a move that surprised me, but made sense as I thought about it. This was prior to Viacom’s merger with CBS Corporation, and they were looking for a way to get into streaming without angering the cable companies, all while bolstering their linear channels. Plus, it’s free, so that’s a good way to gain some traction.

The only other conglomerate in the industry offering a free streaming service at the time was Sony’s Crackle, which streamed content from Sony’s library including at the time Seinfeld, and had found limited success with originals like Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee, and Joe Dirt 2, which brought in over 2 million views in the span of 2 and a half weeks; not bad for a service that hasn’t exactly lit the world on fire.

A month or so after the acquisition, Pluto TV unveiled multiple Pluto TV versions of Viacom channels, which air content older than a year, like Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, MTV, and more. Pluto TV also made new channels to promote events happening on Viacom’s linear channels, like a Tosh.0 channel to promote the new season, an MTV’s The Hills channel for their reboot, and a VMA highlight channel for the VMAs.

When the news initially broke in January 2019, many comments online expressed fear that this would no longer be a free service. As time went on, more and more content was added to the service, and Pluto TV received a new logo and new interface to keep the service fresh. They also unveiled a new ad campaign, both online and through billboards in cities, promoting its free price, its lack of required registration, and the amount of content it has. Considering the tens of millions of active users, I think Pluto TV will remain free. Especially as ViacomCBS’s announced streaming strategy has Pluto TV as its free first stop as a promotional vehicle to encourage users to upgrade to what is now CBS All Access.

More evidence of this was announced July 7th 2019, as Pluto TV will be adding 40 shows from CBS and Comedy Central to the service. The shows range in time period, and includes the first ten seasons of South Park, which is big news considering the only other place to stream the show without cable is on HBO Max. This continues to add more value to Pluto TV, but more than just value for the service, I think it adds value to its name.

CBS All Access currently sits at around 5 million subscribers, which is higher than ESPN+, but lower than HBO Now. The service started in 2014 and paved the way for other companies to start their own services during a time when almost all broadcast and cable shows could be found on Hulu. Since then, subscription numbers have slowly risen for CBS, at least in comparison to services like Disney+ and Apple TV+. Services like those can rely on their brand to bring in subscribers, especially Disney and HBO. Other companies will have a harder time bringing people in, which is why Comcast bought Xumo, and has a free version of their service Peacock.

This leads me into why I believe CBS All Access should have its name changed to involve Pluto in the title. ViacomCBS’s plan for streaming has a three-step strategy: Free, Paid, and Premium. Pluto TV will be free, CBS All Access (or its new name) will be the 1st step in paid providing most of the service, and Showtime will be the premium 2nd step in paid providing more content. To me, it seems odd to even have a third step to get Showtime content, but if it keeps the price lower, I suppose choice is not only a good thing, but kind of the whole reason the streaming revolution started. Regardless, Showtime is an established name so it would make sense to keep that to entice upgrades, but CBS All Access frankly isn’t. Not to mention the CBS name is misleading, as more than just CBS content is on the platform. While CBS is arguably the strongest brand in the ViacomCBS portfolio, to continue using the name while bringing their other properties under a title that just includes CBS would be confusing.

Here’s a few options ViacomCBS can have for free: Pluto Plus, Pluto Prime, Pluto Planet, Pluto All Access, Pluto Max, Pluto Now, Pluto Premium, Pluto Etc. Then, when you add Showtime, just add + Showtime at the end and you’re good to go. Problem solved.


Popular posts from this blog

Pluto TV: Viacom's Different Answer to Streaming

First, Some Context and History All the major media conglomerates are beginning to reign in their content from Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, and are bringing them to their own streaming services for maximum profits. AT&T, who owns WarnerMedia, Comcast, who owns NBCUniversal, and Disney, who also own Marvel and 21st Century Fox, have all announced that they are developing their own streaming services to house all of their valuable content available for a monthly fee. Want to watch Friends? You'll have to subscribe to AT&T's thing. Want to watch The Office? You'll also have to subscribe to Comcast's thing. They'll both probably cost around $10 a month, and you're also going to want Disney+, the home to Marvel. All of these companies are taking a non-linear subscription approach to delivering content, something that we first fell in love with when Netflix introduced their instant streaming service back when they were better known for delivering DVDs through …

Why I Cancelled YouTube TV

I made an article a week or so ago in defense of YouTube TV’s price increase, a stance I still stand by. Many users online are understandably upset about the new price, and that’s reasonable. Some articles are taking the discussion a bit further by suggesting that the price increase betrays the initial goal of YouTube TV and cord-cutting as a whole by offering content at remarkably low prices, which I disagree with.

YouTube TV’s goal was to make live TV better, and they succeeded. The service is generally regarded as the best online live TV service because it has the local channels, the guide is customizable, the DVR is at least as good as a traditional DVR in functionality (something no other online live TV service can say) and gives you unlimited storage with individual recordings lasting for 9 months, and the experience is at least as good as your cable service and probably even better. I call that a success.

The problem comes with the channel lineup. The service initially cost $35, …

Will the ViacomCBS and Disney/Fox Merger Affect Cable TV Prices?

Yes it will, but the reason I ask this question is not from a traditional cable TV perspective, but from a vMVPD, like Sling, and YouTube TV for example.
With Sling, they have three base packages: Sling Blue, Sling Orange, and Sling Blue+Orange. Once upon a time, the difference was essentially if you want Disney channels like ESPN, Freeform, and Disney Channel, those were on Sling Orange, and Sling Blue had the Fox and Comcast channels. Or get both Orange and Blue. Also, the Viacom channels were included on either package, but the CBS channels weren't. Now that it's 2020, the combined entity that is ViacomCBS has stated they have some renewals this year, especially with vMVPDs, which is what made me question how a service like Sling will change, seeing that Disney now owns the FX networks, will they move into the Sling Orange package? Seeing that CBS's cable channels aren't on Sling, will ViacomCBS force their carriage with their renewal? How will this affect the pric…