Skip to main content

My Thoughts on the Ratings of the VMAs on The CW


I'm a fan of media in general, but I love following linear television. It still has the ability to bring in millions of viewers, but its reach has steadily decreased, especially with the 18-49 demographic. The big event shows like the MTV VMAs continue to prove that the ability to reach millions of viewers still exists on television. However Viacom has had to change the way it reaches that linear audience.

The VMAs have been a staple of MTV for over 35 years. Like most big event shows, they’re an easy way for the channel to bring in millions of viewers and excitement on social networks. One thing that has changed is how the show is aired. Prior to 2009, the show was only broadcast on MTV, but from 2009 to 2011, the show also aired on VH1. This briefly stopped until 2014 when MTV, MTV2, VH1, and Logo aired the show. After this year, the show then aired across the Viacom cable channels. Viacom does this with their other big event shows, like MTV Movie and TV Awards, the Comedy Central Roasts, and Comedy Central's Lights Out with David Spade also premiered on Paramount Network and TV Land, and in a rare event actually had higher viewership on TV Land. Either way, the use of simulcasting a big event across multiple channels brings in higher viewership. The viewership on other channels that are not the main home for the event doesn't usually bring in more than 300,000 viewers, but it still helps.

The 2020 VMAs had some obvious changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No audience, taped performances, and video conferencing. The one new thing that caught my eye was an additional channel added to the simulcast list: The CW. CBS and WarnerMedia have a joint venture with the network, so when Viacom merged with CBS, it became a part of the same Viacom family. Given the target audience for The CW is roughly what MTV aims for, it makes sense, but what I was curious to see was the ratings that night for The CW, which you can see here.

The event is very obviously run by MTV, with the channel being the sole one to air a preshow. Still, considering the fact that The CW is a network free to anyone with an antenna, I was very interested to see how many viewers the channel would get. No surprise, the other Viacom cable channels only reached under 300,000 viewers, but I was somewhat surprised to see MTV's broadcast holding the highest viewership at 1.3 million, and The CW airing reaching over 850,000 viewers. 

While I understand the show is very publicized as an MTV event, I was still a little surprised to see The CW, a network, with such little viewership. Yet, I am not that surprised given how poorly the networks have been through COVID-19, with The CW not fairing much better. Still, it's an event The CW doesn't have to pay to produce, and it brought in more viewership than the iHeartRadio Music Festival would bring in for The CW.

Given that the world has more than just linear television to pass the time, it makes sense that Viacom would produce one show that would appear on multiple channels, given that viewership hasn't exactly increased overall for linear television. Still, it's just interesting to note just how much the media landscape has changed. Networks were once a home to shows that could bring in tens of millions of viewers, with cable (on a special event) able to come close to that number. Now that people can watch TV anywhere, even without a television, I'm endlessly fascinated with what the future holds.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pluto TV: Viacom's Different Answer to Streaming

First, Some Context and History All the major media conglomerates are beginning to reign in their content from Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon, and are bringing them to their own streaming services for maximum profits. AT&T, who owns WarnerMedia, Comcast, who owns NBCUniversal, and Disney, who also own Marvel and 21st Century Fox, have all announced that they are developing their own streaming services to house all of their valuable content available for a monthly fee. Want to watch Friends? You'll have to subscribe to AT&T's thing. Want to watch The Office? You'll also have to subscribe to Comcast's thing. They'll both probably cost around $10 a month, and you're also going to want Disney+, the home to Marvel. All of these companies are taking a non-linear subscription approach to delivering content, something that we first fell in love with when Netflix introduced their instant streaming service back when they were better known for delivering DVDs through …

Why I Cancelled YouTube TV

I made an article a week or so ago in defense of YouTube TV’s price increase, a stance I still stand by. Many users online are understandably upset about the new price, and that’s reasonable. Some articles are taking the discussion a bit further by suggesting that the price increase betrays the initial goal of YouTube TV and cord-cutting as a whole by offering content at remarkably low prices, which I disagree with.

YouTube TV’s goal was to make live TV better, and they succeeded. The service is generally regarded as the best online live TV service because it has the local channels, the guide is customizable, the DVR is at least as good as a traditional DVR in functionality (something no other online live TV service can say) and gives you unlimited storage with individual recordings lasting for 9 months, and the experience is at least as good as your cable service and probably even better. I call that a success.

The problem comes with the channel lineup. The service initially cost $35, …

Will the ViacomCBS and Disney/Fox Merger Affect Cable TV Prices?

Yes it will, but the reason I ask this question is not from a traditional cable TV perspective, but from a vMVPD, like Sling, and YouTube TV for example.
With Sling, they have three base packages: Sling Blue, Sling Orange, and Sling Blue+Orange. Once upon a time, the difference was essentially if you want Disney channels like ESPN, Freeform, and Disney Channel, those were on Sling Orange, and Sling Blue had the Fox and Comcast channels. Or get both Orange and Blue. Also, the Viacom channels were included on either package, but the CBS channels weren't. Now that it's 2020, the combined entity that is ViacomCBS has stated they have some renewals this year, especially with vMVPDs, which is what made me question how a service like Sling will change, seeing that Disney now owns the FX networks, will they move into the Sling Orange package? Seeing that CBS's cable channels aren't on Sling, will ViacomCBS force their carriage with their renewal? How will this affect the pric…